Skip to main content
Industry-specific

Authorize.Net vs. NMI vs. Stripe for e-com

Stripe is not a gateway. NMI is not a processor. The distinction costs thousands of dollars per year when you get it wrong.

The category confusion that costs merchants money

Most e-commerce merchants shopping for a "payment gateway" end up comparing Stripe against Authorize.Net without understanding that they're looking at fundamentally different products with different cost structures.

Stripe is a vertically integrated payments company — it acts as the gateway, the processor, and the risk manager in one platform. NMI is a white-label gateway that lets you connect any of dozens of processors behind it. Authorize.Net is a gateway owned by Visa — the incumbent, battle-tested, with 400,000+ merchants and a bring-your-own-processor option that most users ignore.

The right choice depends on your volume, your risk profile, your technical requirements, and whether you want flexibility or simplicity. Here's the breakdown.

Stripe: excellent product, expensive at scale

Stripe's standard rate for e-commerce is 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction. For a merchant doing $25,000/month at an average ticket of $50, that's $725 + $150 in per-transaction fees = $875/month, or a 3.5% effective rate. That is significantly above what a merchant with that volume should be paying on interchange plus.

At $25,000/month with an average interchange rate of 1.7% (a reasonable estimate for a typical e-commerce card mix per Visa's published rates), a merchant on interchange plus at 0.30% + $0.15 over interchange pays approximately $500 + $75 = $575/month. The delta is $300/month, or $3,600/year.

That said, Stripe earns its premium in several areas:

Stripe's genuine advantages:

  • Developer experience is genuinely superior — the API documentation, SDKs, webhooks, and testing tools are best-in-class.
  • Fraud tooling (Stripe Radar) is sophisticated and included.
  • Instant payout options, international payments, and multi-currency support are native.
  • No need to manage a separate merchant account — underwriting is automatic.
  • Billing and subscription management (Stripe Billing) is excellent for SaaS.

Stripe is the right answer for startups pre-product-market-fit, developers building complex payment flows, SaaS companies with global subscribers, and marketplaces using Stripe Connect. It is almost never the right answer for a mature merchant doing $50,000+/month who has time to optimize.

Stripe also isn't an option for merchants in high-risk categories. See high-risk merchant processing for how to approach that.

Authorize.Net: the incumbent, underused correctly

Authorize.Net, now owned by Visa, has been the market-standard gateway for card-not-present transactions since 1996. It supports virtually every processor, integrates with virtually every shopping cart platform, and has the deepest documentation of any gateway on the market.

The critical decision: use it in bring-your-own-processor mode, not the default all-in-one mode.

In all-in-one mode, Authorize.Net acts as both gateway and processor at flat rates of approximately 2.9% + $0.30 — same as Stripe, essentially. In bring-your-own-processor mode, you pay $25/month + $0.10/transaction to Authorize.Net and negotiate your interchange plus pricing separately with a processor or reseller. At $50,000/month, the difference between the two modes is approximately $650/month.

Authorize.Net wins when:

  • Your shopping cart has native Authorize.Net integration and you want zero dev work.
  • You're working with a processor that requires Authorize.Net as a condition of their best pricing tier.
  • You process card-not-present volume that doesn't require advanced tokenization or complex recurring billing logic.
  • You want a gateway with 25+ years of stability and the deepest third-party integration ecosystem.

Authorize.Net's weaknesses:

  • The back-office dashboard is dated. It's functional, not pleasant.
  • Advanced recurring billing requires their ARB (Automated Recurring Billing) module, which is less flexible than Stripe Billing or NMI's recurring tools.
  • No native advanced fraud scoring beyond basic AVS/CVV — you'll need a separate fraud tool if chargeback rates are a concern.

NMI: the reseller-designed gateway

NMI (Network Merchants Inc.) was built for the ISO/reseller distribution model. Where Authorize.Net has one owner (Visa) and one set of features, NMI is designed to be white-labeled and customized — most resellers have their own branded version. That distribution model means NMI's pricing is set by the reseller, not published publicly, but it typically runs $15–$25/month.

NMI wins when:

  • You need high-risk boarding. NMI supports a much broader processor network including high-risk acquirers. If you're in CBD, nutraceuticals, subscription, or adult content, your options with Authorize.Net are narrow. NMI opens the full ecosystem.
  • You have complex recurring billing needs. NMI's Customer Vault and recurring billing logic is more configurable than Authorize.Net's ARB module.
  • Your developer needs API flexibility. NMI's Direct Post API and Transaction API both offer more programmatic control than Authorize.Net's API for complex use cases.
  • You want a white-labeled experience for your customers (resellers building payment solutions for clients).

NMI integrates with your existing merchant account — pair it with the right acquirer for your MCC and risk profile, and the gateway cost is a minor line item. View our gateway options page for the processors we commonly pair with NMI.

The decision matrix

| | Stripe | Authorize.Net | NMI | |---|---|---|---| | Best for | Startups, SaaS, dev-heavy | Established e-com, cart integrations | High-risk, reseller, complex billing | | Pricing model | Flat 2.9% + $0.30 | $25/mo + $0.10/txn (BYOP mode) | ~$15–$25/mo (reseller set) | | High-risk support | No | Limited | Yes | | Developer experience | Excellent | Good | Good | | Recurring billing | Excellent | Moderate | Strong | | Processor flexibility | None (Stripe is the processor) | Wide (BYOP mode) | Wide | | Contract | None | None | Varies by reseller |

The take

For most e-commerce merchants above $25,000/month, the question is not Stripe vs. Authorize.Net — it's whether to use Authorize.Net or NMI in bring-your-own-processor mode with an interchange plus account. Stripe is a premium-priced product worth its cost at early stage and for technically complex use cases. At maturity, it's a generous donation to Stripe's margins.

NMI edges out Authorize.Net for high-risk merchants and anyone building recurring billing logic. Authorize.Net wins on simplicity and cart compatibility for standard e-commerce.

The gateway is only one half of the equation. The pricing with your processor is the other half — and it matters more. Review our pricing structure or reach out and we'll model the full cost of your current setup against alternatives.

This is general business information, not legal or financial advice.

Want PayMullet to do this math for you?

Drop your last processing statement. We audit it line by line and come back with a plan — free, zero obligation.

Get a free audit

Frequently asked

What is the difference between a payment gateway and a payment processor?

A gateway is the software layer that tokenizes card data, routes the authorization request to a processor, and returns the approval or decline to your checkout page. A processor (acquirer) is the financial institution that actually moves money between the card networks and your bank account. Authorize.Net and NMI are gateways — you still need a processor behind them. Stripe operates as both a gateway and a processor in one integrated platform.

Can I use Authorize.Net with any processor?

Authorize.Net has two modes. In its original mode, you bring your own merchant account from any compatible processor and connect it to Authorize.Net as the gateway. In its newer "all-in-one" mode, Visa-owned Authorize.Net acts as both gateway and processor at flat rates (currently 2.9% + $0.30 for most transactions). Most merchants with significant volume should use the bring-your-own-processor mode to preserve pricing flexibility.

Why would I choose NMI over Authorize.Net?

NMI is purpose-built for resellers and merchants who want maximum flexibility. It supports a broader range of processors, better high-risk boarding options, and more robust recurring billing and tokenization tools. NMI also has a better API for complex integrations. If you're a developer, a SaaS company with recurring billing, or a high-risk merchant, NMI is usually the stronger choice.

Does Stripe work for high-risk merchants?

Generally, no. Stripe's automated underwriting declines or terminates accounts in many high-risk categories — CBD, firearms, nutraceuticals, adult content, gambling-adjacent businesses. Stripe is excellent for standard e-commerce, SaaS, and marketplace platforms. High-risk merchants need a dedicated high-risk merchant account with an acquirer who has explicitly approved their MCC.

What does a gateway cost?

Authorize.Net charges $25/month gateway fee plus $0.10/transaction in bring-your-own-processor mode. NMI's pricing varies by reseller but typically runs $15–$25/month. Stripe charges no separate gateway fee — it's embedded in the 2.9% + $0.30 flat rate. For high-volume merchants, the separate gateway model almost always wins on total cost.

Keep reading

Processing fundamentals9 min read

Interchange plus vs. tiered pricing, decoded

Interchange plus passes the card networks’ published rate through at cost with one transparent markup. Tiered pricing buries it in three buckets — and the processor decides the bucket. Here is the math that ends the conversation.

Compliance7 min read

You’re not high risk. Your bank is.

CBD, firearms, subscription, nutraceuticals — banks slap the same label on all of them and charge the same 4.5%. The real risk lives on the acquirer’s balance sheet, not yours. The right sponsor bank fixes it.

Processing fundamentals10 min read

How compliant 0% processing actually works

Done right, 0% processing is a regulated dual-pricing program that passes the card-acceptance cost to the cardholder. Done wrong, it is a class-action waiting to happen. Here is the compliance edge.